Lookonchain APP

App Store

Trump vs. Powell: Fed Showdown Could Shake Crypto Markets

DanteX
/2025.04.18 12:56:37
Trump has called for Jerome Powell’s removal, slamming the Fed’s slow rate cuts amid global easing. He plans a 2% cut next FOMC and aims to reshape the Fed via the Supreme Court. Markets are bracing for potential upheaval, with Trump’s bold pro-crypto stance fueling $BTC $ETH $SOL price targets. A clash of economic visions may redefine U.S. monetary policy.

Jerome Powell will be FIRED in April

Rates will be cut by 2% on next FOMC meeting

Next target: $BTC - $150K, $ETH - $5K, $SOL - $500

Here's Trump's secret plan and when crypto will explode👇🧵

On April 17, Donald Trump called for the immediate dismissal of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, labeling him “consistently late” and unfit for the role

He criticized Powell for not cutting interest rates despite falling oil and food prices and referred to the Fed’s latest report as “a typical mess”

According to Trump, the Fed is acting too slowly and holding back the U.S. economy when conditions clearly call for easing

Trump pointed to the European Central Bank as a contrast, noting it has cut rates seven times since mid-2024

Meanwhile, the Fed has only made one 1% reduction in the same period and maintains rates at 4.25–4.5%

He believes this gap is putting the U.S. at a disadvantage in global markets and slowing job creation

Trump claims that the U.S. is generating billions in revenue each week from tariffs imposed earlier this month

He argues this income offsets inflation risks and strengthens the economic case for rate cuts

For him, strong tariff-driven inflows plus declining consumer prices create a clear opportunity for monetary easing

On April 2, Trump announced tariffs between 10% and 49% on imports from 185 countries and up to 145% on Chinese goods

He described this as a strategy to defend domestic industries and rebalance trade flows

Critics warn the policy could drive up input costs and prompt retaliatory actions from key trade partners

Still, Trump insists these tariffs will stimulate manufacturing and make the U.S. more self-reliant

In response, Jerome Powell warned that the tariffs could increase inflationary pressure and disrupt economic growth

He said the Fed needs more data to assess how tariffs affect supply chains, pricing, and consumer confidence

Powell emphasized that monetary decisions must be based on long-term stability, not short-term political narratives

Powell reminded the public that the Federal Reserve operates independently and that the President lacks the authority to remove its chair

He declared he will not resign and intends to serve his full term, which ends in May 2026

He stressed that policy decisions will continue to be guided by economic indicators rather than political pressure

Nevertheless, Trump escalated the situation by filing a request to the Supreme Court on April 11

His aim is to gain legal power to dismiss the heads of independent agencies, including potentially the Fed chair

If approved, this could set a constitutional precedent and allow Trump to bypass traditional institutional limits

Trump’s conflict with Powell is not new - it dates back to 2018, when Trump himself appointed Powell

By 2019, Trump was already calling the Fed “the only problem” with the economy and blamed Powell for tightening too aggressively

Now, with Trump back in office, his pressure has become more direct and legally strategic

Market reaction to these developments has been mixed

Following Powell’s recent comments, the dollar dipped slightly while U.S. equity markets rose between 0.2% and 1.6%

Investors appear cautiously optimistic, but political interference remains a key source of uncertainty

The next Fed meeting on May 6–7 will be closely watched for any policy shifts or signals

Markets will look for clues on whether the Fed will proceed with rate cuts or maintain a cautious approach

The tone of the post-meeting statement could either ease tensions or further widen the divide with the White House

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that the Trump administration plans to begin identifying Powell’s potential successor this fall

This suggests that even without court approval, the White House is preparing to change Fed leadership after May 2026

But if the Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor, that timeline could shift much sooner

Economists warn that undermining central bank independence could damage U.S. credibility and raise borrowing costs

A politically dominated Fed would lose market trust, making inflation control and crisis management far more difficult

These risks grow with every new attempt to subject the Fed to executive influence

Trump advocates for protectionism, low rates, and direct political control over economic levers

Powell stands for institutional stability, data-driven decisions, and inflation management

This is more than a personality clash - it’s a collision between two economic philosophies

In the short term, Powell may delay rate cuts to avoid the appearance of yielding to political pressure

In the long term, continued attacks from the White House could weaken the Fed’s authority and destabilize expectations

The outcome of this confrontation may redefine the balance between democratic institutions and market governance in the U.S.

Relevant content
Bitcoin’s Next Move: Sideways Relief Before a Deeper Bear Market?

Bitcoin may enter a prolonged sideways phase between $57K and $87K as markets enter a relief period following a 52% drop from ATH. This consolidation could mirror the 2022 fractal, creating liquidity before a potential breakdown toward the $44K–$50K range.

Doctor Profit/3 days ago

From “Buy $1 of Bitcoin” to Token Controversies: The Davinci Jeremie Story

Davinci Jeremie urged people to buy $1 of Bitcoin in 2013 and became a symbol of early conviction. Years later, fame, lifestyle flexing, and token promotions sparked criticism. His journey reflects both crypto foresight and influencer-era controversy.

StarPlatinum/2026.03.04

Jane Street Under the Microscope: Liquidity, Derivatives, and Market Disruption Claims

A sweeping narrative ties Jane Street to India’s expiry-day options case, alleged 10AM Bitcoin sell patterns, Terra’s collapse, and ETF plumbing. While none prove misconduct, critics argue a common structure: move spot, monetize derivatives, keep execution opaque.

Bull Theory/2026.02.27

Jane Street, ETFs, and Bitcoin: Allegations, Market Structure, and the 10AM Debate

A controversial narrative links Jane Street, ETF mechanics, and Bitcoin’s price behavior, pointing to lawsuit allegations, 10AM volatility patterns, and derivative hedging dynamics. The discussion raises broader questions about liquidity, structure, and price discovery.

Justin Bechler/2026.02.26

Jane Street and Terra: Revisiting the UST Collapse Through New Allegations

A new federal lawsuit alleges Jane Street exploited non-public information tied to Terraform’s liquidity defenses, accelerating UST’s depeg and the Terra collapse. The firm denies the claims. The case may reignite debates on structure, design, and regulation.

Diana/2026.02.25

Bitcoin at Extremes: Oversold Signals and the Bottom Formation Thesis

Mean reversion and on-chain models sit at levels historically linked to bottom formation after capitulation. Realized losses reached record USD values, while deviations from anchor models remain extreme. Price pain may be fading; patience remains key.

Checkmate/2026.02.25