Lookonchain APP

App Store

Bitcoin (BTC) — Onchain News & Whale Tracking

Real-time Bitcoin whale movements, exchange flows and onchain findings tracked by Lookonchain. 7943 updates and counting.

2026.07.12 14:54

The deadline for Bitcoin data limit proposal BIP-110 is approaching, with miner support for the proposal remaining near zero.

Bitcoin’s BIP-110 proposal is approaching its early August deadline, yet miner support for the measure remains below 1%, signaling significant resistance to the initiative. Officially titled “Temporary Soft Fork for Reducing Data”, BIP-110’s core controversy centers on restricting non-financial data on the Bitcoin blockchain. The proposal aims to cap OP_RETURN data capacity within a year, ban most arbitrary data exceeding 256 bytes from being written to the chain, and limit certain script formats primarily used for data storage. Supporters argue the plan would refocus the Bitcoin network on its payment function and reduce node operational burdens; opponents counter that it would escalate policy disputes over block space usage into consensus rule changes, effectively determining which transactions qualify as “acceptable”. Strategy founder Michael Saylor and Blockstream co-founder Adam Back have both publicly opposed BIP-110. Saylor remarked, “There are 110 things more dangerous than junk data”, adding that the proposal would “turn the junk data debate into a consensus change, invalidating some currently valid transactions that pay fees”. Back stated that if supporters cannot accept the status quo, they may choose to fork, but “Bitcoin will not join”. Data shows BIP-110 uses a user-activated soft fork mechanism with a 55% miner signaling threshold, though miner signaling rates have never topped roughly 1% to date, with the current cycle sitting at 0 and no major mining pools backing the measure. The share of nodes running BIP-110 software also remains in the single digits, primarily from Bitcoin Knots users. The proposal’s current signaling cycle will end around block height 959,615, with a voluntary lock-in period expected in early August and activation targeted for around September. If broad support is still absent by then, the initiative could result in a minority of nodes forming a separate chain.

2026.07.11 22:41

Analyst: Bitcoin may be entering the final stage of a bear market, projected to rise to $250,000 over the next two to three years.

Real Vision’s chief crypto analyst Jamie Coutts has stated that Bitcoin may be entering the late stages of its current bear market. While the bear market is not yet over, downward momentum has begun to weaken. The current BTC price is roughly 50% lower than its all-time high of $126,100 set in October 2025. Coutts described the current trend as a “typical bear market,” pointing out that Bitcoin’s volatility has fallen by around 50% compared to the previous cycle, suggesting this downturn may not be as severe as prior bear markets. However, he cautioned that all current trend indicators remain clearly bearish, and markets do not mechanically replicate historical cycles. He noted that longer-term momentum indicators are starting to show bullish divergence, signaling that negative momentum is decelerating—but this does not mean Bitcoin has technically exited the bear market. Beyond tightening global liquidity, deteriorating on-chain demand was a key factor driving Bitcoin’s earlier decline. On long-term price projections, Coutts is cautious about Bitcoin reaching $1 million by 2030; instead, he forecasts BTC will rise to $200,000–$250,000 over the next two to three years. He also warned that the Bitcoin community needs to address the potential threat of quantum computing more definitively by 2027, as major protocol upgrades could take approximately five years to complete.

2026.07.11 20:18

Galaxy Digital's Head of Research: The Bitcoin Policy Institute has filed an application to intervene in the abandoned Bitcoin case, and intends to urge the court to dismiss all the lawsuits.

Galaxy Research Head Alex Thorn posted on social media that the Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI) has formally filed a motion with the court to intervene in the high-profile "Noah Doe" case and participate in the litigation as a defendant. BPI stated that its application is submitted in accordance with relevant provisions of New York State's Civil Practice Law and Rules, and no similar application on this matter has been filed with any court before. According to the submitted documents, BPI comprehensively denies all main allegations in the plaintiff’s complaint in its proposed answer, only acknowledging that the plaintiff is seeking a declaratory judgment through this case. For other allegations, BPI either denies them or states it lacks sufficient information to form a judgment. BPI also introduced that the organization was founded in 2021, is a non-partisan, non-profit organization headquartered in Washington D.C., U.S., focusing on researching the policy and social impacts of Bitcoin and emerging currency networks, and conducts independent research free from influence from industry players such as cryptocurrency companies or trading platforms. The case has drawn significant market attention as it involves an anonymous individual attempting to obtain ownership of a large amount of Bitcoin allegedly belonging to Satoshi Nakamoto through legal proceedings. With BPI’s application to intervene as a defendant, the organization stated it will oppose the plaintiff’s claims and push the court to dismiss the entire lawsuit.

2026.07.11 16:34

Data: Bitcoin treasury firms have seen their combined market capitalization drop by over $100 billion, while their total Bitcoin holdings have instead climbed to 1.14 million coins.

Analyst Darkfost noted that since October 2025, the total market value of global Bitcoin treasury companies’ holdings has shrunk from $396 billion to $272 billion, erasing over $100 billion in value. Over the same period, the total Bitcoin held by these firms rose from 953,000 to 1.14 million coins — the market value drop was driven entirely by falling Bitcoin prices, not sell-offs. However, it is worth noting that since May this year, when Bitcoin entered a significantly undervalued range, the pace of these firms’ Bitcoin purchases has slowed sharply and nearly stalled. The companies’ most concentrated buying period ran from November 2024 to October 2025, during which their holdings tripled in less than a year at purchase prices roughly between $75,000 and $125,000 — a zone right within Bitcoin’s all-time high territory. The pressing question now is: With these firms having built up large positions at the peak, will they sell off at low levels? Strategy recently became the first to initiate Bitcoin sales; whether other treasury companies will follow suit and become a new source of selling pressure for the market remains to be seen. Given their current total holdings of 1.14 million Bitcoin, if more firms are forced to cut positions amid the slumping market to ease financial strains, this could pose additional downside risks to Bitcoin’s price.

2026.07.09 23:56

JPMorgan: The biggest risk for Bitcoin is not Strategy’s sell-off, but blockchain adoption that bypasses public chains and tokens.

JPMorgan Chase’s analyst team noted that the market views Strategy’s Bitcoin sale plan as a key risk for the crypto sector, but it is not a major structural threat to Bitcoin. The more fundamental risk lies in tokenization, payments, and settlements increasingly taking place on permissioned infrastructure that does not rely on public blockchains. If this trend continues, the entire crypto ecosystem could face a "structural downgrade"—marked by slower transaction activity, reduced liquidity, and weaker capital inflows—ultimately weighing on Bitcoin. The analysts stated bluntly: "In our view, a more significant risk stems from the way blockchain is adopted in traditional finance, which continues to bypass public, permissionless networks." The analysts explained that institutional adoption so far has clearly favored permissioned chains, as they offer advantages in privacy, KYC/AML controls, governance, throughput, legal accountability, and regulatory certainty, posing a competitive threat to public blockchains like Ethereum. If tokenized deposits are widely adopted—especially in non-transferable forms favored by regulators—it could reduce demand for stablecoins in institutional payments and settlements; SWIFT’s blockchain initiative and central bank digital currency (CBDC) projects such as the digital euro and digital renminbi further strengthen regulated alternatives. In the roughly $500 billion tokenized real-world assets market, while Ethereum currently holds a certain share, this likely reflects early-stage experimentation rather than the market’s long-term structure. As institutional adoption grows, issuance, custody, settlement, and lifecycle management will likely be conducted more on private or permissioned infrastructure that meets requirements for identity, confidentiality, and operational resilience, with public blockchains used only for distribution and limited secondary trading.

← Prev Page 7 / 159 Next →

Popular tokens

BitcoinEthereumHyperliquidSolanaTRONBNBTetherAaveXRPPepeFartcoinOndoJupiterUniswapBonkPendleEthenaArbitrumAvalancheLidoChainlinkPolygonDogecoinCardano