Lookonchain APP

App Store

America’s Bitcoin Advantage: Morgan Stanley’s Strategic Signal

Swan
/2025.05.08 21:40:30
Morgan Stanley now considers Bitcoin large enough to be a strategic reserve asset. While they still cite volatility concerns, U.S. entities already hold 35–40% of Bitcoin’s supply—far more than gold—signaling a unique national incentive to see Bitcoin succeed. The shift from legacy assets to BTC is accelerating, and the U.S. may be quietly positioning itself as the dominant Bitcoin superpower.

Something big just happened—and most missed it.

Morgan Stanley says Bitcoin is now large enough to qualify as a strategic reserve asset.

But the real story isn’t the report—it’s the game theory it reveals.

Is the U.S. uniquely incentivized to see Bitcoin win?

Let’s unpack 🧵

The report claims Bitcoin is still “too volatile” to adopt today.

But here’s the paradox: volatility is dropping—steadily, measurably.

And once it meets their threshold, the price won’t be $97K.
It’ll be much higher.

By then, the opportunity will be priced in.

Morgan Stanley modeled what a proportional reserve allocation to Bitcoin could look like:

• $370B in capital
• 12–17% of total supply

Those figures mirror existing currency reserve proportions.

If that shift happens, one thing’s clear: the repricing would be immediate.

Let's zoom out.

Global assets now exceed $1 quadrillion, growing by $200 trillion in 2 years.

But most of that “growth” is just fiat debasement.

Adjust for money supply expansion, and only two assets gained real ground:
• Gold
• Bitcoin

Bitcoin leads—up 323% in two years.

Here’s where it gets geopolitical.

Americans—via ETFs, public companies, and individual holders—own an estimated 35–40% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply.

Compared to ~8–10% of global gold. (clip: Matthew Pines)

That’s not just exposure.
That’s leverage.

Remember: the U.S. has already created a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

The goal? Become the "Bitcoin superpower of the world" by acquiring "as much as possible"—without raising taxes—using tariffs, gold revaluation, and seigniorage.

This isn’t theory. It’s already in motion.

Gold was built for the empires of the past:
• Heavy
• Easy to seize
• Slow to settle

Bitcoin was made for the digital age:
• Portable
• Hard to confiscate
• Instantly verifiable
• Hard-capped by code

Legacy metal vs. protocol money.

BlackRock’s IBIT just passed GLD in inflows—even while underperforming gold.

And gold is having a historic run.

Capital is rotating.
From legacy safe haven…
To the future of capital.

Bitcoin is decoupling.
From tech. From TradFi. From systemic fragility.

It’s emerging as the global outside money.

And the U.S.—uniquely positioned to benefit—is moving accordingly.

Relevant content
BNB Chain at a Crossroads: From Retail Liquidity to Institutional Coexistence in 2026

After years as a retail trading hub, BNB Chain is evolving into a rare ecosystem where retail users, institutions, and builders coexist. With RWAs, stablecoins, and real yield products expanding, 2026 positions BNB Chain as a key bridge between TradFi and crypto.

Biteye/6 hours ago

Who Really Paid for This Bull Market? Bitcoin’s Shift from Crypto Cycles to Wall Street Plumbing

This article dissects why Bitcoin’s latest bull cycle felt muted despite historic adoption. As ETFs, DATs, miners, and institutions reshaped liquidity, volatility collapsed, retail faded, and crypto-native capital sold into strength—marking BTC’s transition into a fully financialized asset.

DoveyWan/1 days ago

Inside a Polymarket Bot: How Mechanical Hedging Locks in Risk-Free Profit

This article breaks down how a Polymarket bot exploits short-term mispricings without predicting direction. By asymmetrically buying YES and NO and keeping their combined cost below $1, traders can mathematically lock in profit on Polymarket—pure structure, no luck.

Jayden/3 days ago

Trading the Meme: How Polymarket’s Most Mocked Market Becomes a Consistent Cash Machine

The “Jesus Christ return” market on Polymarket isn’t about belief—it’s about structure. Low liquidity, recurring whale sell-offs, and attention cycles create repeatable 2–3 trades for those who buy panic and sell rebounds, year after year.

Dexter's Lab/6 days ago

How a Polymarket Trader Lost $2M in 35 Days: A Case Study in Negative Expectancy

A deep dive into how trader “beachboy4” lost over $2M on Polymarket despite a 51% win rate. The analysis shows how overpaying for consensus, all-in bets, and ignoring probability-based risk management made losses inevitable.

Lookonchain/2026.01.05Original

The Ultimate Swing Trading Playbook: How Concentration and Volume Drive Big Wins

A firsthand guide to swing trading built on extreme focus, volume analysis, and catalysts. By going all-in on one high-conviction stock at a time, this strategy shows how attention, patience, and discipline can outperform diversification.

Kevin Xu/2026.01.04