Lookonchain APP

App Store

Where Did FTX’s $138 Billion Go? The Shocking Math Behind the Bankruptcy

Lookonchain
/10 hours ago
FTX wasn’t truly insolvent — it was mismanaged, misrepresented, and dismantled. Court documents show the estate could have repaid all users in 2022 and grown to $136 B in value. Instead, asset fire sales, legal fees, and flawed leadership burned over $120 B in potential wealth.

FTX: Where Did the Money Go — And Who Took Control

When FTX collapsed in November 2022, over seven million users had deposited roughly $20 billion. The exchange froze withdrawals and filed for bankruptcy, leaving an $8 billion customer hole. For years, creditors waited—until 2025, when the estate announced full repayments of 119-143% of claims.
Ironically, the company was never truly insolvent; it suffered a liquidity crisis, not a balance-sheet failure.

The Missed Path

Court filings show that as of the bankruptcy date, FTX still held $14.6 billion in assets—enough to repay users in-kind.
These included:

$5.5 B in cash & liquid crypto

$4.6 B in venture investments

$3.7 B in illiquid tokens

Real estate + subsidiaries worth ≈ $0.4 B

Had withdrawals resumed and assets not been seized, customers could have been made whole by late 2022.

By September 2025 valuations, those same holdings would exceed $136 billion—with massive exposure to winners like Anthropic ($14.3 B), Solana ($12.4 B), FTT ($21.9 B), and Robinhood ($7.6 B). In short, the estate that’s now distributing ~$18 B could have been worth nearly eight times that.

What Went Wrong

According to the document, once external counsel Sullivan & Cromwell (S&C) and attorney John J. Ray III took control on Nov 11 2022, the company was placed into a Delaware bankruptcy—despite FTX still processing withdrawals and negotiating liquidity deals.
Within hours, the exchange was shut down, staff fired, and S&C retained as bankruptcy counsel.

The report alleges that these lawyers had incentives to push for bankruptcy because fees would then be paid directly from the estate.
To date, nearly $950 million in legal and consulting fees have been approved, with another $450 million reserved—making the FTX case one of the costliest since Lehman.

Narrative Control

Publicly, Ray and S&C portrayed FTX as “hopelessly insolvent,” using early statements that allegedly misrepresented its balance sheet.
Prosecutors in Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial echoed that framing, citing liabilities while ignoring offsetting assets.
Documents show that even in 2022, Alameda and FTX together held $25 B in assets against $13 B in liabilities, remaining solvent on paper.

The report suggests that calling it a “dumpster fire” justified shutting down operations and liquidating holdings at depressed prices—often to insiders or below market value.

Value Erosion

If Ray’s team had simply frozen operations and waited, the estate might now hold $136 B in assets and $111 B in net value. Instead, after sales, fees, and settlements, less than $18 B remains.

Key losses cited:
FTX Equity: $66.4 B
FTT Token: $21.9 B
Anthropic Stake: $12.9 B
Solana: $9.1 B
Robinhood: $7.0 B
Sui: $2.8 B
Legal & Consultancy Fees: $1.4 B
Government Claims & Settlements: $16.9 B
Total Losses    ≈ $138 B of value destroyed

The Core Argument

The 25-page document—authored by Sam Bankman-Fried and team—asserts that FTX was solvent throughout, and that its collapse was worsened by the lawyers’ intervention, asset fire sales, and self-serving incentives.

Critics note that this framing may absolve FTX leadership of negligence, yet the underlying math shows something undeniable: the assets were real, the prices recovered, and the bankruptcy process itself may have consumed most of the potential upside.

Today

Customers are finally being repaid—but in USD, not crypto. A user owed 1 BTC in 2022 will receive ~$17 K, even though Bitcoin now trades near $114 K. Equity investors who put in $1.95 B get back ~$230 M.

So yes, everyone’s “made whole,” but only in a narrow legal sense. In real terms, the FTX estate may have burned over $120 B in potential value.

Relevant content
X402 Explained: Turning the “Payment Required” Code Into the Future of AI Transactions

X402 revives the long-unused HTTP 402 “Payment Required” code by enabling crypto and stablecoin payments directly within API calls. It lets AI agents pay for data autonomously, removing middlemen and unlocking a new layer of machine-to-machine commerce.

Jarrod Watts/3 days ago

The Rise of x402: How Coinbase and a16z Are Powering the Next $30 Trillion AI Payments Revolution

x402, known as the Payments MCP, enables AI agents to make on-chain payments. Backed by Coinbase and Cloudflare, it’s becoming core to Base, Solana, and beyond. With a16z and Ribbit predicting $30T in agentic transactions by 2030, x402 may redefine global finance.

s4mmy/5 days ago

Gold’s 5-Sigma Crash: Inside the Largest Single-Day Drop Since 2013

Gold plunged -5.7%, its biggest one-day fall since 2013—a 5-sigma event that’s happened only 34 times since 1971. Despite the $3 trillion wipeout, fundamentals stay strong as institutions and central banks keep buying amid rising debt and liquidity expansion.

The Kobeissi Letter/2025.10.23

The Hidden Puppeteers: How Insiders Orchestrate Bitcoin Crashes and Bull Runs

A deep dive into how insiders allegedly manipulate crypto markets—triggering dumps, bull runs, and altseasons. From $700M Binance transfers to pre-Trump announcements, this thread exposes how big players control liquidity and profit from chaos.

Tracer/2025.10.22

BTC Weekly Outlook: Volatility Ahead, Short Squeeze or Final Dip?

After last week’s perfect projection and the biggest liquidation cascade in years, $BTC faces another volatile week. With short liquidity clustered around $116K–$117K and the CME gap near $106.7K, traders watch for either a short squeeze or a final dip to $100K.

CrypNuevo/2025.10.20

Wiped Out, Not Broken: How I Lost $30M in the Biggest Crypto Liquidation Ever — and Why I’m Coming Back Stronger

After losing over $30M in the largest crypto liquidation event ever, a top trader reflects on what went wrong, the lessons learned about leverage and risk, and why he’s staying optimistic. It’s not the end — just the start of his next chapter.

Unipcs (aka 'Bonk Guy')/2025.10.12