Bit Digital re-staked 29,900 ETH 1 hour ago

On April 13, The New York Times reported that Iranian officials are weighing abandoning uranium enrichment as a condition for the U.S. to end the war.

April 13th — Per Bitget data, U.S. stock Circle (CRCL) has bucked the trend, trading at $93.96 as of now, up 6.91% since the opening bell.

April 13 – Per data from Bitget, U.S. stocks opened lower today, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average down 0.5%, the S&P 500 Index falling 0.22%, and the Nasdaq Composite declining 0.26%. Cryptocurrency-related equities also posted synchronized losses: - Coinbase (COIN): -1.83% - Circle (CRCL): -0.49% - MicroStrategy (MSTR): -1.87% - Gemini (GEMI): -2.38% - Bit Digital (BTBT): -2.93%

On April 13, blockchain interoperability protocol Hyperbridge disclosed details of a prior DOT exploit incident that resulted in ~$237,000 in losses. The vulnerability stemmed from missing input validation in the HandlerV1 contract’s `VerifyProof()` function—specifically, it failed to validate that `leaf_index < leafCount`, allowing the attacker to forge a Merkle proof. Using this flaw, the attacker gained admin access to the bridged DOT token contract on Ethereum, then minted 10 billion bridged DOT (over 2,800 times the legitimate circulating supply of ~356,000) and cashed out via a decentralized exchange (DEX). Hyperbridge stated it is collaborating with security partners to trace the funds, and cross-chain functionality will remain suspended until the investigation concludes.

April 13 — Pakistani Defense Minister Asif stated in an interview that the prospect of the U.S. and Iran resuming negotiations remains, with a new round of talks set to begin soon.

April 13: An article in the American Bankers Association (ABA) Banking Journal on April 13 notes that experts—including the ABA’s Chief Economist—argue the White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA)’s recent payment stablecoin research report raises misleading questions for policymakers. The CEA report focuses on *how a ban on payment stablecoin issuance would impact bank lending*, concluding the ban would boost bank lending by just ~$1.2 billion with minimal overall effect. But the ABA contends the real policy concern is not the consequences of a “ban,” but the risks of allowing **yield-bearing** payment stablecoins: - **Accelerated deposit outflows**: Yield incentives would drive households and businesses to shift funds from bank deposits (especially at community banks) to stablecoins—with significant impact if the market grows to $1–$2 trillion. ABA analysis shows Iowa alone could see $4.4 billion–$8.7 billion in reduced loans. - **Community bank harm**: Deposit outflows