Lookonchain APP

App Store

Jane Street and Terra: Revisiting the UST Collapse Through New Allegations

Diana
/5 hours ago
A new federal lawsuit alleges Jane Street exploited non-public information tied to Terraform’s liquidity defenses, accelerating UST’s depeg and the Terra collapse. The firm denies the claims. The case may reignite debates on structure, design, and regulation.

Was Jane Street the Secret Villain Behind Terra's $40 Billion Crypto Catastrophe? 

In a development that could reshape perceptions of one of cryptocurrency's most infamous failures, a federal lawsuit filed on February 23, 2026, accuses quantitative trading firm Jane Street of exploiting confidential information to accelerate the depegging of Terra's UST stablecoin, contributing to a $40 BILLION market wipeout. 

The Sequence of Events, According to the Suit

According to the complaint (filed in Manhattan federal court, Case No. 1:26-cv-1504), Jane Street obtained confidential details about Terraform's emergency moves through insider connections – including employees like Bryce Pratt and Michael Huang, plus co-founder Robert Granieri named in the suit.

May 8, 2022: Terraform quietly withdrew ~150 million UST from Curve's 3pool (the main liquidity venue for UST alongside USDC, USDT, DAI). This wasn't announced publicly – it was an internal defense mechanism to support the peg.

Minutes later (less than 10 minutes): A wallet linked to Jane Street allegedly executed the largest single UST sale in that pool's history – dumping 85 million UST. The suit claims this massive sell-off, done with advance knowledge of the liquidity removal, was the catalyst that pushed UST below $1 and ignited the death spiral.

This rapid sell-off, the filing argues, was the tipping point that broke UST's peg, triggering a "death spiral" where LUNA's supply hyperinflated to maintain equilibrium, ultimately rendering both tokens near-worthless.

Allegations of Betrayal and Insider Ties

The suit goes beyond the trade itself, alleging a deeper web of interactions. Jane Street executives, including co-founder Robert Granieri and employees like Bryce Pratt and Michael Huang, reportedly engaged in discussions with Terraform leadership, including founder Do Kwon.

These talks included expressions of interest in a potential bailout: Jane Street purportedly considered injecting $200 million to $500 million by purchasing discounted LUNA or Bitcoin reserves. Group chats and communications cited in the complaint suggest Jane Street positioned itself as a possible rescuer, gaining access to sensitive details in the process.

Instead, the lawsuit contends, the firm used this non-public information to "front-run" the market — unloading positions just before the FULL COLLAPSE. Claims include violations of securities and commodities laws, fraud, and unjust enrichment, with Snyder seeking disgorgement of profits, damages, and a jury trial.

Jane Street's Response: 'Baseless' and 'Desperate'

Jane Street has vehemently denied the accusations. In a statement released shortly after the filing, a spokesperson described the suit as "a desperate attempt by a bankrupt entity to extract money through baseless claims." The firm emphasized that its trades were legitimate market activities and that any interactions with Terraform were exploratory and non-binding.

This isn't the first post-collapse legal action against trading firms; a similar suit targeted Jump Trading in 2025, highlighting ongoing efforts to assign blame for Terra's implosion.

Broader Implications for Crypto and Traditional Finance

Filed amid Terraform's ongoing bankruptcy proceedings, the case could provide restitution for creditors if successful. More significantly, it underscores tensions between traditional finance (TradFi) players like Jane Street — a powerhouse in quantitative trading — and the nascent DeFi space.

Experts note that Terra's failure stemmed from multiple factors: its algorithmic design's inherent fragility, unsustainable 20% yields on the Anchor Protocol, and broader market volatility. Yet, if proven, these allegations could prompt stricter regulations on insider trading in crypto markets, where boundaries between public and private information remain blurred. 

As of February 24, 2026, the lawsuit is in its early stages, with no immediate rulings expected. It revives debates from the 2022 "crypto winter," a period that saw cascading failures including Three Arrows Capital and FTX.

For investors still holding LUNA Classic (LUNC) or monitoring crypto recoveries, this could signal potential windfalls, or just another chapter in a long saga of accountability. 👀

Relevant content
Bitcoin at Extremes: Oversold Signals and the Bottom Formation Thesis

Mean reversion and on-chain models sit at levels historically linked to bottom formation after capitulation. Realized losses reached record USD values, while deviations from anchor models remain extreme. Price pain may be fading; patience remains key.

Checkmate/5 hours ago

Bitcoin’s ETF Era: Correlation, Holder Structure, and the Next Capital Wave

Bitcoin didn’t fail as an asset — it matured into an ETF-driven trade. As institutional ownership rose, correlation with tech risk intensified. Short-term pressure reflects holder structure shifts, not thesis collapse.

Eric Jackson/1 days ago

Bitcoin Bear Market Psychology: Stage 4, Liquidity Traps, and the Path to Capitulation

This weekly report frames Bitcoin within a six-stage bear market model. With BTC in Stage 4, price stagnation drives exhaustion and weak-hand selling while liquidity builds. The harshest mechanical drop may be over, but fear and capitulation likely remain ahead.

Doctor Profit/2 days ago

When Wall Street Owns Bitcoin: ETF Concentration, Losses, and the Search for a New Narrative

Nearly 10% of Bitcoin is now held by Strategy and spot ETFs. With average ETF cost bases above price, $7B+ in unrealized losses and record outflows show normie capital under pressure—leaving BTC dependent on a fresh narrative to reaccelerate.

Jim Bianco/2026.02.03

Why Bitcoin Fell While “Crypto” Bled: The Contagion Trade Explained

Bitcoin’s weak year isn’t OG selling or a “silent IPO.” It’s crypto contagion. Illiquid altcoins forced insiders to sell BTC to prop up air-token markets, while disciplined capital (ETFs, MSTR, Wall St) drained volatility and killed alt-season rotations.

Bit Paine/2026.01.28

Gold at $5,000 Is Not Bitcoin’s Failure—It’s the First Act

Gold’s parabolic breakout isn’t a Bitcoin defeat but the same debasement trade unfolding in phases. Gold moves first as the hedge for states; Bitcoin follows as the hedge for people. They trend together long term, but cycle apart short term.

Swan/2026.01.27